Conducting security reviews is the initial step of mitigatory strategies that help application security engineers examine software for potential vulnerabilities and weaknesses. By carrying out these assessments, security engineers can identify and fix bugs before they turn into paths of exploitation by cyber attackers.

This blog will cover security reviews, compare traditional web security and API security, discuss challenges in performing security operations, and walk through the step-by-step process of conducting an API security review.

Let’s dive in!

What is a Security Review?

A security review or audit thoroughly examines and improves the safety of a system, application, or component. API (application program interface) security involves examining the framework of the software's interface to find potential weaknesses that attackers could exploit. This assessment includes reviewing user authentication methods, data encryption processes, and the system's error recognition and handling.

The primary aim of a security review is to make sure organizations well-protect the API against common attacks like:

• Injection attacks.

• Man-in-the-middle (MITM).

• Denial-of-service (DoS).

• Broken access control attacks.

• Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS).

When security engineers conduct a careful API security audit, they can find and fix security issues early, keeping sensitive data safe. This also allows them to prevent service disruptions and maintain the integrity of their systems.

Comparison Between Traditional Web Security and API Security

In traditional web security, the network is like a castle with a moat—a strong perimeter defense. Requests follow set protocols, mainly from web browsers, and attacks are noticeable in incoming requests.

But API security is different. It involves many endpoints, changing request formats, varied clients, and attacks that may not appear in requests. This shift requires specific security methods to safeguard API endpoints from misuse. Here is a table of comparisons between Traditional Web Security and API Security in different aspects:

Aspect Traditional Web Security API Security Network Perimeter Follows a "castle and moat" approach with a heavily guarded perimeter. The multitude of API endpoints and protocols often lack a clear perimeter, making it challenging to define access control. Request Protocols Requests adhere to mostly static, well-defined protocols. Request formats can change frequently, especially in dynamic DevOps environments, making it harder to enforce security measures. Each change can also require manual reconfiguration. Client Environment Clients are usually web browsers, allowing for browser verification to detect bots or suspicious activities. Clients vary widely, including mobile/native apps and other services. Attack Detection Security engineers can often detect attacks, such as XSS or DDoS, by examining incoming requests based on traffic patterns. Many forms of API abuse appear legitimate in requests, making traditional detection methods ineffective. This calls for more sophisticated detection mechanisms.

This comparison indicates that conducting a comprehensive API security review is essential in response to the increasing complexity and frequency of cyberattacks.

How to do an API Security Check: An Easy Guide

Here is a step-by-step process for conducting an API Security review to help protect sensitive data, reduce unauthorized access, and minimize potential risks:

Step 1: Identifying and Mapping API Endpoints

List and categorize all API endpoints based on their roles, sensitivity, and potential security risks. Identify the endpoints that handle sensitive data or perform critical functions. These endpoints are more likely to have vulnerabilities and require careful examination during security review.

Additionally, create a clear map of each API endpoint that details the types of requests and responses they handle, their expected behaviors, and any security measures in place.

This map serves as a useful reference during the security assessment, ensures thorough coverage, and ultimately leads to effective risk mitigation.

Step 2: Authentication and Authorization Testing

Authentication and authorization testing are crucial for securing APIs. When conducting security reviews, it's essential to focus on the following aspects:

• Evaluating the Effectiveness of Authentication: Assess the strength of authentication methods, such as API keys or tokens. Ensure that only authenticated users have access to protected resources.

• Reviewing Authorization Controls: Test authorization mechanisms to guarantee that only authorized users or roles can perform specific actions. Watch for risks such as unauthorized sensitive data access or eluding authorization checks.

• Testing for Improper Access Controls: Identify misconfigurations that could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive API endpoints. Thoroughly review access control rules and configurations to prevent security breaches.

Step 3: Input Validation and Data Integrity

Proper input validation is essential for preventing injection attacks and maintaining data integrity. During testing, focus on the following:

• Analysis of Input Validation Methods: Assess the API's approach to input validation for fending off common vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), SQL injection, or XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. Test diverse input scenarios to cover both expected and unexpected cases.

• Maintaining Data Integrity: Ensure the API diligently validates, sanitizes, and encodes user-supplied data to prevent tampering or corruption. During transmission between client and server, both parties must validate data integrity.

• Test for Data Leakage and Other Exposure Risks: Identify potential risks of data leakage, such as unintentionally revealing sensitive information in responses or error messages. Thoroughly assess scenarios where sensitive data can be exposed unknowingly.

Step 4: Handling Error and Exception Management

Proper error handling and exception management are also crucial aspects of API security. During security review, assess how the API responds to errors and exceptions. Check for appropriate error codes, clear messaging, and effective logging practices.

Scrutinize error responses and stack traces for potential vulnerabilities in data disclosure so that sensitive information remains protected. Additionally, evaluate exception management practices to ensure the API handles unexpected scenarios effectively.

Step 5: Rate Limiting and Throttling

Test the API to handle rate limits and identify weaknesses. Check the API's performance under different loads to ensure rate limiting works correctly.

While conducting that, maintain responsiveness and stability during high-traffic periods. This ensures that the API remains available and responsive to legitimate users while mitigating the risk of overload or exploitation by attackers.

Step 6: API Abuse and Security Review Automation

To maximize efficiency and coverage in API security review, go for automation. When testing, focus on:

• Exploring Various Techniques to Identify and Prevent API Abuse: Understand common API abuse scenarios, such as parameter tampering or API key exposure. Develop test cases to detect and address these risks effectively.

• Implementing Automated Security Testing: Utilize tools like OWASP ZAP or Burp Suite for automated vulnerability scanning, security checks, and fuzz testing to ensure wide coverage of potential security threats.

Challenges While Performing Security Operations

Effective security operations are crucial for organizations to protect against threats, but they face several challenges:

1. Managing Security Tools

Security operations employ many different tools, which makes monitoring and managing all the data challenging. A typical security setup might include over 20 technologies, which can be difficult to track. Security engineers need a central platform to bring all the information together to handle this.

2. Lack of Skills and Knowledge Sharing

A major issue is the shortage of skilled staff and the sharing of knowledge. This skill gap makes monitoring systems, responding to attacks, and correctly diagnosing issues hard. Staff might miss problems or respond incorrectly due to insufficient knowledge, which leads to more false alarms.

3. Legal and Regulatory Compliance

Different industries and regions have various legal and regulatory standards, like GDPR or HIPAA, which require organizations to follow specific actions. Security teams must know and implement the required actions to comply with these rules to avoid legal and financial penalties.

4. Budget Constraints

Budgets are often limited, making it challenging to justify spending on security operations and incident response. Organizations need to show a clear return on investment to get approval for spending.

Final Thoughts

Conducting thorough security reviews is crucial to protect APIs against sophisticated cyber threats. Identifying vulnerabilities early and implementing robust security measures allows organizations to safeguard sensitive data and maintain user trust. Considering the unique challenges of API security, organizations significantly reduce risks by adopting a structured approach to assessments. Ultimately, investing in comprehensive security operations ensures long-term success in the digital landscape.

Akto, a Proactive API security platform, simplifies managing and securing APIs for organizations and security engineers.

Akto helps you discover all your APIs and uncover vulnerabilities with its powerful testing library. Additionally, you can create custom tests with this tool for your specific needs.

Book a demo right away!